AaRON & Margaret WALLACE FUNDACIJA

Prijavite to peticijo zdaj stati proti korupciji, vladnih, pravnih in policija kršitve; White Collar Crime, nepoštenih Zaposlovanje in poslovna praksa; potrošnikov goljufijam in kažejo vašo podporo preglednosti vlade, odgovornost; Civic reform; Uveljavljanje etične standarde, civilne in verske pravice Svoboda!

Peticijo Honorables predsednik Barack Hussein Obama II in Združenih držav Amerike državni tožilec Eric Holder Himpton, Jr

Ki bi radi, da pošljete peticijo? Prosimo, izberite enega.

Častni predsednik Barack Hussein Obama II Cenjeni državni tožilec Eric Holder Himpton, Jr

Z vnosom Vaše ime tukaj ste pritrjevanje svoj podpis, da te peticije (obvezno):
Od: Vaše ime (obvezno)

Mesto Živite v (obvezno)

V državni Živite v (obvezno)

Poštna številka (obvezno)

Vaš e-naslov (obvezno)

Današnja Datum (obvezno)

I Want to predložil peticijo.

Za: The častni predsednik Barack Hussein Obama II
Bela hiša
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500

Cenjeni gospod Eric Holder Himpton, Jr
ZDA Attorney General
Ameriško ministrstvo za pravosodje
Washington, DC 20500

cc: UN Secy Gen Ban Ki-Moon, visoki komisar za človekove pravice Navanethem Pillay gospa, predsednik Združenih narodov za človekove pravice gospod Martin Ihoeghian Uhomoibhi, ameriški senat in House pravosodnih odborov, in kongresnega Črna politične klike

Honorables predsednik Barack Hussein Obama II in Attorney General Eric Holder Himpton, Jr:

Sem podpisani v skladu z duhom ustave Združenih držav in prosti demokracijo, kot je prijavljenih in usposobljenih državljanov in volivcev Združenih držav Amerike, ki sem vam pisati z občutkom za resno zaskrbljenost in ogorčenje, da vam peticijo in zahtevajo vaše osebne in takojšnje ukrepanje za odpravo do nezaslišane krivice v primerih Abdul-Jalil Al Hakim proti CSAA in Alameda County zadevi št 811337-3 in Abdul-Džalila al-Hakim V. REŠEVANJE Industries, Inc, zadeva št . 821885-2.

Vsakdo, ki je slišal o tem primeru, preberite spisov, novice ali ogledov video posnetkov ali podatkov, ki ga vsebuje in je vložena v primerih, vključno s hlačke in mnenj sodišč, ve, da sta bila poskusov Abdul-Džalila Al Hakim je potrudil in odločilo sredi korupcija, senzacionalizma in histerija, ki na svojem jedru, je pomenil rasno blaznosti in verskega preganjanja. Indicting besede od sodnikov, medtem ko na klopi v obeh primerih sami, pokažite na rasizmu, pristranskosti in predsodkov, tudi znotraj sodne dvorane.

Pozivam vas, za odpravo tega 13 letni zgodovini hude kršitve ameriškega ustavnega prava in mednarodnih standardov na področju pravosodja, kot je razvidno iz mnogih pravnih skupin po vsem svetu in za pravosodje ministrstva, da nemudoma začne s civilno preiskavo pravic preučiti številne primere iz nezaslišane in rasističnih sodišči, tožilstvi in ​​odvetnika in podjetja kršitve iz leta prvotnem sojenju reševanje Industries v letu 2003 in se nadaljuje preko celotnega sojenja CSAA konča leta 2008 na trenutno nedelovanje države, v Kaliforniji Pritožbe in vrhovnih sodišč. Zastaranje ne bi smel biti dejavnik v tem primeru, saj je zelo močni dokazi o trajni zarote, da zanikajo Abdul-Džalila njegove ustavne pravice.

Al Hakim proti CSAA in reševanje primerov Industries, sta več kot $ 20 milijonov 13 let; sporna pravna dejanja, ki ima največjo spis v zgodovini Alameda County višje sodišče z več kot 70 datotek polja vlogah; več 120 predlogi in odzivi; Al Hakim je imela več kot 300 sled eksponatov, več kot 5.000 strani eksponatov, 3.000 strani dokumentov za poskusno nasprotni argument, 20 strokovnih prič; 77 drugih prič; več kot 100 straneh žirije navodil, z diskvalifikacije je zoper Sodnik, za številne stroške iz sodnega obnašanja do korupcije, kjer je VSAK sodnik v tem primeru priznal napake, storjene krivokletstva, se recused ali vse tri!

Abdul-Jalil Al Hakim, zelo dobro znano, uspešni poslovni direktor, producent in muslimani v maternem afriško-ameriškega rodu iz Oaklandu v Kaliforniji, vložil pritožbo pri Zvezni Združenih držav državnega tožilca na Ministrstvu za pravosodje, iz sovraštva kriminala o islamofobiji in ksenofobije storjeno proti njemu, ki jih sodnik David C. Lee med sojenjem reševanje Industries v vrhovnega sodišča Alameda County v Kaliforniji.

Ta prizadevanja je, da nadaljuje s to preiskavo naprej s stroški kazenskega zunajbesedilno goljufije ob sodišča države Kalifornije, ki spoliation dokazov, in doktrino "nečiste roke" proti toženi stranki / sovražnega intervenienta AAA zavarovanju, Ron Cook in odvetniška pisarna iz Willoughby, Stuart & Bening, zagovornik Steve frizerski in odvetniška pisarna iz Ropers Majeski in Oakland Mestni tožilec John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy dvorana, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, nekdanji in sedanji Oakland San Leandro Mesto Attorney Jayne Williams in nekdanji Oakland Mesto zaposleni Pat Smith, pod pogojem, spis tožene stranke Stephana Barber in Ron Cook skoraj leto dni in ni obvestila sodišča o tem neoprostljive nezakonito kršitev v veriga pripor datoteke, namerne in namerno izdelavo in avtorsko lažne dokaze.

Zvezna Pritožba, pripravil in vložil ga Abdul-Džalila v pro na, ima široko podporo, ki temelji demokrati in republikance, je vložila Congresswoman Barbara Lee z uradi kongresniki John Conyers in Charles Rangel, je bil pregled več pravnih strokovnjakov, z zagovarjanjem nekdanji republikanski senator JC Watts, ki je stranko od al-Hakim-jev.

Zvezna Pritožba naslovljena na zaskrbljenost, da ravnanje višje sodišče sodnikov zvišala na raven nadomestila za zvezno kriminalu in državljanske pravice kršitev, ker klop, na kateri sodnik pravila je "po barvi prava" in zagotovo kršitev kdo'S državljanske pravice, je zvezni zločin. "Muslimani, tako kot katera koli druga skupina, ne bojte se govoriti, ko so bile njihove pravice skrajšana. Če eden ne govori, potem gre za prestopke neprijavljenega in storilec nadaljuje, spet škodi nenadzorovano, ni važno koga je prestopnik "je dejal al-Hakim.

Pritožba, morda še bolj pomembno, ne samo zahteval Veselo Friedlander, vodja civilnega oddelka pravice, da bi preiskavo sodne zločinov iz sovraštva, ampak tudi številne druge državljanske pravice in zaradi kršitve procesnih pravosodnega in tožilske kršitve in odvetnik ekstrinzičnih goljufije na sodišče in pravo, ki so sami neposredno zadeve pritožil. JC Watts v sprašuje, "Kaj naj teroristično dejanje v Rusiji imajo opraviti z malomarno kontaminacije doma v Ameriki?" Postavljeno trditev, da mora biti upoštevanje in odziv na številna vprašanja v pritožbi.

Po pregledu v USAG urada, je bila zadeva misel kot tako Nečuven, da je tudi zloglasni Bradley Schlozman, ki je zdaj odpustili in se sooča z zvezno obtožnico odstopil tožilci Alberto Gonzalez za odstranjevanje demokratične odvetniki iz ameriških odvetnikov pisarne generali na državni ravni, pošlje Al Hakim pismo zadevo (zaradi pristojnosti omejitev) na California State državnega tožilca v Kaliforniji članica odvetniške zbornice, na California State sodni svet, in Kaliforniji komisar državno zavarovanje za preiskavo in pregon. In to so bili republikanski Sodniki in pravobranilstvo počutje pritožbe!

Ampak to ne bi zgodilo. California generalni državni tožilec in kandidat za guvernerja, Jerry Brown, ki je odgovoren za izvajanje preiskav Oakland mesta državnega tožilca Johna Russo, nekdanji in sedanji Oakland San Leandro mesta državnega tožilca Jayne Williams, nekdanji državni tožilec Tom Okrožno Orloff, ki trenutno District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley , Alameda County Superior sodišča, državna Pritožbe in Vrhovno sodišče sodniki, in različnih podjetij tožene stranke v tem primeru je tudi sam brani nekateri kriminalci in prikrivanje še isti korupcije je ki naj bi se za preiskave in pregon!

California državni tožilec Jerry Brown, Oakland Odvetnik John Mesto Russo, nekdanji in sedanji Oakland San Leandro Mesto Attorney Jayne Williams, nekdanji District Attorney Tom Orloff, in sedanji District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, vsi trdijo, da so zagovorniki preglednosti vlade, odgovornost in Civic reformo in tout svoje predvolilne obljube in dosežkov na TV-oddaje in radio v video posnetke, na svojih spletnih straneh, v številnih sporočilih za javnost in v nastalo novice člankov. vplivala na ta vzvišeni obljube kampanje, ki so jih vsi paraded Civic reformo čiščenje Vlada in kazenski pregon namenjen ponovni vzpostavitvi zaupanja javnosti v vlado, ohranja najvišje etične standarde, "je prijavila nepravilnost," Program, pravne storitve za izboljšanje pogojev za revne, začela prava obleke proti posameznikom in družbam domnevno škodljivega vpliva na javnost in okolja, starejših zlorabe, homeowner in najemnik pravice, krizni izključitev in bančne in nasilni kriminal.

So se moda kot neodvisni nadzorni organi, in vratari za ljudi, boj proti vladni in policijski napak in korupciji, kriminalu, nepotizma nepoštenih praks zaposlovanja, ki nasilnih tolp, ki potrošnika goljufijami, nepoštenih poslovnih praks, neurejene zdravstvu Kalifornije System, kampanje razkritjem in lobistov dejavnosti.

Glede na spletno mesto Russo je, je Real Oakland Upravna reforma (ROAR) zasnovan tako, da "bo vlada bolj odgovorna mesta, bolj pregledno in bolj učinkovito."

Vendar podrobnejši pregled razkrije, da so ti več kot prazne besede, da tančice njihove Neuspešni predvolilne obljube, Posredniki za beli ovratnik kriminalu; pravobranilci rasizma, fanatizma in selektivni pregon in Bele razreda privilegij!

Državni tožilec Jerry Brown, Oakland Odvetnik John Mesto Russo, nekdanji in sedanji Oakland San Leandro Mesto Attorney Jayne Williams, nekdanji District Attorney Tom Orloff in podjetij tožbe sedanjega okrožnega državnega tožilca Nancy E. O'Malley je sama znaša malo več kot v istem "Shakedown "nasprotujejo, ko so sued.When jih rešiti te zahtevne obleke pustijo od dobička pravnih oseb storilca off kavelj za resnično neizmerno milijonov dolarjev v pristojbine, globe, kazni, odškodnine, kazni, stroški, dejanski in kazenske odškodnine in prihodki NIKOLI šel žrtvi teh podjetij lopove, ki JAVNIH! Poleg tega so ta podjetja kriminalci NIKOLI poslal v zapor za svoje bel ovratnik kaznivih dejanj, še najbolj manjšina, so priseljenci, ali verske manjšine kršitelji v zapor z najvišjimi kazni za domnevne manjše kršitve. Kje je enako izvajanje, pravice in tudi rok za pregon domnevnih kaznivih dejanj? Zakaj Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff in O'Malley pospeševanje očitno selektiven kazenski in sodni postopki deli z raso, denarja, razred, spol, državo izvora, vera? je javno posilstvo teh Sleight-of-ročno kazenskih sodnih taktike v podjetjih lopove, rjavi, Russo, Williams, Orloff in O'Malley, medtem ko pri čemer zavajajo v prepričanje, da so "zaščita za zaupanje javnosti! ", kot navaja Russo", da je naloga vlade, da izvede Ljudske poslovanje v imenu ljudi, odgovornost do ljudi, v celoti pa zaradi ljudi. "

Oakland Mesto odvetnik John Russo in nekdanji in sedanji Oakland San Leandro Mesto Attorney Jayne Williams izdelani dokaze in posadili, da dokazov, ki je naklonjeno toženih strank v spisov.

Al Hakim je tudi v zadnjem času proizvaja jasen, neizpodbiten, ustanovljen "Kajenje pištolo" dokazila o stalnih očitne nezakonitih dejavnosti Oakland mesta državnega tožilca Johna Russo, nekdanji in sedanji Oakland San Leandro mesta državnega tožilca Jayne Williams, nekdanji Oakland Mesto zaposleni Pat Smith, zagovornik Stephan Barber in tožena stranka Ron Cook v CSAA in osnovni primer za reševanje Rooter, da je Oakland Mestni tožilec John Russo in mesto pravobranilstvo Urad zavezana zunajbesedilno goljufij, GOLJUFIJAM od države, ki SUBORNATION IN napeljevanja k PERJURIOUS pričevanja, ZAGOTAVLJANJE primere datotek o pravdnih in dokazi toženi stranki, ki SPOLIATION DOKAZOV, Fabricating dokaze in SADIKE PRO.KOVINSKIH DOKAZOV V DATOTEK sodnih primerov, Poskus, da zavaja javnost V PODPORO z obtoženci SODNEGA POSTOPKA TEORIJE, ki Klevetanje prevara z dajanjem spisov, da tožena stranka Stephan Barber in drugi od Ropers trdnih pregona, Majeski , in Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening in ostali iz Willoughby odvetniški pisarni, Stuart & Bening skoraj leto dni, potem je jasno zgrajeno goljufivo umeten dokazov v letu 1999 in posajenih te dokaze, ki je naklonjeno toženih strank v datotekah Šest let po primeru je bil zaprt, se ukvarjajo z spoliation preostale dokazov v sodnem datoteke iz leta 1991, ter spodbujati pričevanj, ki temelji na tem, zasajeni dokazov v CSAA proti Al Hakim in osnovno sodno reševanje Rooter ki je bila ustvarjena z Thru zunajbesedilno GOLJUFIJAM spremljevalni pričevanje nabavljeno thru priznal suborned in naročil perjurious dejanja John Russo in drugi, ti se ukvarjajo z ukrepi za uničenje sodnih postopkov pravnega primeru Al Hakim je, da se ukvarjajo z ukrepi za coverup svoja nezakonita dejanja, storjena, podprto in podpirale s to kriminalno dejavnostjo s tem krši neoprostljive v verigi priporu od sodnih spisov za sprejem tožene stranke sporov strategijo tako CSAA in osnovno sodno reševanje Rooter.

John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy dvorana, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, in nekdanji in sedanji Oakland San Leandro Mesto Attorney Jayne Williams in nekdanji Oakland Mesto zaposleni Pat Smith, so toženci Stephan frizerski in Ron Cook vse ni in ni hotel zagotoviti informacije, ki ga želi al-Hakim, in še ni in ni hotela videti v sodišče odredilo sodni poziv za pričanje odlaganja dvakrat in pod sodišče odredilo sodni poziv za pričanje poskusno in so povzročile al -Hakim in družine, da bodo prisiljeni iz svojih 1.000.000 $ plus dom in pisarno, izključeni iz več kot 20 milijonov dolarjev obleko prava, in več milijonov poslovanja za 13 let through kršitev City odvetnikov v poslovnih in profesionalnih kodeksov in zunanjo goljufij, subornation od perjurious pričevanje, ki stori ta dejanja po barvi prava z nečistimi rokami, in ga je treba preganjati, da v celotnem obsegu zakona.

John Russo, nekdanji in sedanji Oakland San Leandro Mesto Attorney Jayne Williams in The Oakland mestnem štabi odvetniške pisarne kaznivih kršitev civilnega zakonika, ki Business in poklicih kodeks in pravila poklicnega ravnanja, in California topove udari v središče al- temeljne državljanske in človekove pravice, je Hakim in pravico do sodnega varstva po zakonu, ki jo zagotavlja ZDA spremembah ustave in Kaliforniji ustavo. Ti ukrepi upravičeni kot zločina pod Unruh pravice Zakona o pravdnem Ralph pravice zakonom in Bane zakona, medtem ko so jasni zločini verskega fanatizma in nestrpnosti, kot tako, je to ravnanje dvignila na raven nadomestila za zvezno kriminalu in Civilna pravice kršitev, ker mestnega pravobranilstvo deluje "po barvi prava" in zagotovo kršitev državljanskih pravic nikomur, je zvezni zločin. To odvzem državljanskih, človekovih in predpisanega postopka Al Hakim pravic s strani organa kazenskega pregona mandata City odvetnikov za dvig Oakland na raven kaznivih dejanj in "kršitve s strani lokalne in zvezne uradnikov kazenskega pregona. Ta kazniva dejanja Russo in njegovo osebje zahteva, da se izda sodišče odredilo sodni poziv k pričanju.

Ukrepi proti nekdanji Alameda County okrožnega državnega tožilca Tom Orloff, tok okrožnega državnega tožilca Nancy E. O'Malley, Alameda County in Ministrstvom za preživnino otrok (ACDCSS)

Al Hakim je moral vložiti tožbo zoper nekdanjega okrožnega državnega tožilca Toma Orloff in Alameda County District pravobranilstvo (DA) in Alameda County Ministrstvom za preživnino otrok (ACDCSS), ker že več kot 15 let so večkrat ni in ni hotela uveljaviti sodišča lastne naročila za pošteno in pravilno uporabo in računovodstva plačil Al Hakim je v zaupanju v DA v svojem fiduciar za mladoletnega otroka Al Hakim razrešitvi Al Hakim in mladoletnega otroka, več kot 2.000 $ plačanih denarnih sredstev. Pri tem DA ustvarja "mitološko" arrearage in odprt račun v imenu Al Hakim in v njegovem imenu dolguje za mladoletnega otroka, in ko al-Hakim zavrnila plačilo svoje goljufije, kot počne še danes, nato pa nezakonito zaračunavajo Al Hakim z zločin krši statut otroka podporo za neplačila, poročanje o domnevno kršitev, da države Kalifornije za zbiranje in ministrstva motornih vozil za prekinitev njegove vožnje privilegij za neplačila in nezakonito tossing Al Hakim v "zapor dolžniki", začasni njegov voznik dovoljenje, se prekliče svoje potni list in uničuje svoje več milijonov kredita. ACDCSS ukrepov in trdil, "desno" opraviti na ta način ne vsebuje vseh državnih ali zvezni zakon, uredbe ali drugega zakona in zato nimajo pravno moč in omogoči, da je ustavno sodišče nemočne in ne uradnik lahko samo "izdajo" odločilo v njihovo korist za kritje ujeli storil.

Država Kalifornija Jerry Brown državni tožilec in kandidat za guvernerja nadomestka v
22. januarja 2008, California Attorney General Jerry Brown in urad generalnega državnega pravobranilstva države Kalifornije nadomestiti v kot odvetnik zapisa v tem primeru za Alameda County Ministrstvom za preživnino otrok domnevno "V interesu pravičnosti". Kaj je tu pravica, ko se je takrat branil, skritih in tako naprej complicitly storil priznal zavestno in namerno zunajbesedilno goljufije na državni, al-Hakim in njegove družine, in sodišče, kazenskega pregona kršitve; namerne in zlonamerne pregon; kršitve; navzkrižja interesov ; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court's act or reliance; harassment ; and intimidation committed by former District Attorney Tom Orloff, current DA's Nancy E. O'Malley, Maureen Lenahan, Valgeria Harvey, counselors L. Lavagetto, Ms. K. Pendergrass, Ms. Adler, Kris Ferre, and accountant Mr. Lovelady and others unnamed in the DA's office; as well as Commissioner Glenn Oleon's abuse of discretion, willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias that resulted in error.

During the appeal al-Hakim was forced to file a motion against Jerry Brown to augment the court record to include important transcripts of hearings that the DA admitted they had cheated the al-Hakim family. Despite the fact that al-Hakim had paid for the transcripts in advance, as with the motions that were “denied” because the appeals court did not rule on them in a timely manner, it also refused to augment the record on appeal when it was clear that the evidence would be harmful to the State and defendants Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) and the Alameda County District Attorney(DA). The Appeals Court had discretion to take additional evidence on appeal (Code Civ. Proc., § 909.) where the proffered evidence demonstrates that the matter turns on the evidence tendered.

Alameda County Superior Sodišče sodnik Jon Tigar
Alameda County sodnik Jon Tigar, vidno tresenje in Mrmljanje, utrpel zlom duševno na klopi, kot je priznal na javni obravnavi presenetljivo sedmi Challenge Za razlogom, Oster več kot 750 strani obtožnice, ne da bi prebrali to trenutkov po tem, ko je bila vložena in vročena Al Hakim v sodni dvorani 20. novembra 2008!

Po približno 5 minut, da ne more, da pripravi vse, Tigar začne zloma blebetal in Mrmljanje, da "al-Hakim je dejal, da so vse obtožbe na ta izziv so enake kot so bile prejšnje, da ne želim iti skozi še en izziv, želi, da bi odločanje o predlogih, in "čeprav je sodišče pritožbe ne morejo dogovoriti, da je bil izbris z izzivom, ne da bi jo prebrali", lahko Al Hakim vložiti pisanje, če hoče in če je pritožbeno sodišče strinja , potem bo al-Hakim bi dobili drugo obravnavo ". Nato je navedeno, da bo na voljo, da po obravnavi.

Nato je izogibati, ni in ni hotela pravočasno datoteke in služijo pisni odgovor na izziv razlogom in nadaljevala, da odloča o zadevah, slišal, da trenutek in zanikal predloge obeh Al Hakim je po izpraznitvi žalovanja red 7. aprila 2008 in sojenje konča Minute Vrstni red 9. aprila 2008, od brezvestnih Tigar sodnika.

Sodnik Jon Tigar prekinjena kritična priča pričevanje častnega sodnika Leo Dorado, ker on in zagovornik / Toženci Stephan frizerski in drugi o Ropers trdnih prava, Majeski, kot tudi Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby in Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening in drugi od Willoughby odvetniški pisarni, Stuart & Bening, bali al-Hakim bi raziskala korupcije, tajni in neprimerno vedenje sodnikov in odvetnikov poročajo ameriški državni tožilec v primerih, al-Hakim!

Poleg tega Tigar prekinjena pričevanje Ron sodelovanje zagovornik / Tožena stranka Cook še al-Hakim še vedno uspe, da bi dobili več kot 20 ključnih sprejeme nesporno krivdi Štefana Barber in drugi od Ropers trdnih pregona, Majeski in Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening. Tigar tudi libeled pričevanje in avtor perjurious, zavajajoče in goljufive izgube zakonca in sojenje konča naročila za uničenje v sporu pravne primeru Al Hakim je!

Dejanja sodnika Tigar o "namerni sodni nepoštenosti" niso samo zavestno in namerno nezakonito, škodljivo, nevarno, obrekljivih, perjurious, zavajajoče in goljufive krši državljanskih in človekovih pravic Al Hakim in pravico do poštenega sojenja: so nesramni, žaljivo, žaljivo in izpodbijanje integritete sodišča in je to storil V PODPORO od toženih strank TEORIJE SODNEGA POSTOPKA ki je služil kot lastno pravnega svetovalca v tej isti zadevi zelo!

There is an infinite amount of evidence herein to attest to Tigar's lying under oath and perjury, misrepresentations, deceit, dishonesty, willful and prejudicial misconduct, bad faith, incompetence, conflicts of interest, bias, calling al-Hakim a liar without any substantiation or justification; instructing al-Hakim not to mention Tigar's perjury or to speak his own truth; threatened retaliation to charge him with contempt when al-Hakim refused to back off his charges of the judges perjury, deceit; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and avoid appellate review; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and issues sanctions; willfully and intentionally withholding filing and serving orders (possibly backdating orders) then acted on the orders after the applicable deadlines for al-Hakim to legally and properly respond, thus forcing al-Hakim to forfeit his civil rights and right to due process; irresponsible failure as a judge to read, interpret, and apply the applicable laws, accusing al-Hakim of attacking judges in open court, has attacked other parties in open court while dressed in civilian clothes yet performing his duties as a judge and his honest refusal to recuse “goes beyond mere negligence” ; this conduct falls into the category of willful misconduct by a judge as arising out of conduct which is done in bad faith and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute. The deception practiced by Judge Tigar during these events, as well as his specious actions before al-Hakim on every occasion, are equally antithetical to, and inherently incompatible with, his duties to uphold the law and the search for truth, reflects a gross lack of judicial temperament and a purpose other than the faithful discharge of judicial duty, and is at minimum improper action.

al-Hakim presents clear, uncontroverted, unopposed, uncontested, corroborated proof Tigar has written, signed and submitted willfully perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent orders in attempting to deceive the public in support of his rulings; threatened, and belittled al-Hakim; made improper references of al-Hakim's character and as being untruthful; coupled with his perjury regarding the discovery matters and categorical denial of every discovery issue raised before him by al-Hakim reflected a prejudgment of al-Hakim's discovery claims, his case and a lack of impartiality; responded to his disqualification by his failure and refusal to timely filing an answer; doing so 8 days later only after al-Hakim had requested the written answer at least six times; filing an answer 8 days later only after al-Hakim contested his continued sitting in the case and indicated his intent to file an appeal for same; stating al-Hakim “attacks judges” in his answer without any explanation; calling al-Hakim a liar in his answer without any substance; publicly criticizing al-Hakim in court on the record; repeatedly lied under oath; made knowingly false statements in an effort to demean, humiliate and provoke plaintiff while lying under oath and perjury; dishonesty; fraudulent deception; calumny deceit; willful and prejudicial misconduct; abuse of discretion; negligence; bias; prejudice; misrepresentation; incompetence; conflict of interest; bad faith; collusion; denial of due process; obstruction of justice; racism; bigotry; has exhibited, expressed and shown a fixed opinion of al-Hakim; displayed favoritism towards the defendants; made false accusations; harassed al-Hakim; has willfully, deceitfully and recklessly indulged in a series of offensive acts and statements against plaintiff and has displayed disdain, malice, and a mental attitude or disposition toward al-Hakim that prohibits the right to a fair hearing or trial; failed and refused to respond to the allegations contained in the challenges for cause; conduct prejudicial; and advocated a judicial imprimatur of the defense's position were grounds for disqualification under Code Civ. Proc. on the ground of misconduct, prejudicial misconduct, bias, and prejudice in violations of Code Civ. Proc., Business and Professions Codes, the Rules of Professional Conduct, the California Const., the California Code of Judicial Ethics Canons that violates al-Hakim's fundamental civil rights and due process under the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution and as applicable to the State of California Constitution as a "miscarriage of justice." Judge Tigar's persistent willful misconduct, bad faith, mistreatment, promised retaliation and “atmosphere of unfairness” determines that there is a high probability he will continue his unethical behavior if he were to continue in a judicial capacity in the future.

California Appeals Court
al-Hakim has feared, and quite correctly so, that as in the past, this California Appeals Court Division lead by Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, and court administrators Mary Quilez and Clerk Diana Herbert had engaged in and were directly responsible for the denials and resulting dismissals of his appeals actions as they would not act on his motions and merely deny them outright or by not making a ruling until it's jurisdiction has run and any order is “timed out” . He has had this Appeals court do this twice when it was known to the court the information sought to be found or augmented to the record was fatal to the opposition, they denied them outright or by not making a ruling until it's jurisdiction has run.

al-Hakim had requested the Appeals Court grant his request to supplement the record on Appeal and present evidence imperative to the establishment of Ron Cook, the law firm of Willoughby Stuart and Bening, CSAA and it's defense counsels Sean O'Halloran, Stephan Barber and the firm of Ropers Majeski as the hostile intervener in his underlying case against Rescue Industries and Bay Area Carpets, provided evidence that was procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious testimony by them and the underlying defendants, their counsels and experts; engaged in actions to interfere with his legal case; engaged in actions to coverup the unlawful act of suborn and solicited perjurious testimony; committed fraud upon the court of the State of California; committed willful, criminal and corrupt perjury, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud; fraudulent concealment by willfully and intentionally withholding their knowledge and insight of the intervention hearing and the transcript of said hearing; and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their responsibility and the legal impact; extrinsic fraud; spoliation of evidence; and qualify for the doctrine of unclean hands with the appropriate consequent sanctions and punishment upon them was denied with no explanation.

As these actions were taken against the State, the State has a vested interested in this matter not going forward in a fair and just manner , and is the basis for not providing al-Hakim with the clerks transcripts that were ordered and paid for; the ordered and paid for transcripts of the hearings to complete the record on appeal; denying the motions to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and not ruling on the July 31, 2008 Motion for Reconsideration of the courts July 19, 2008 order denying al-Hakim requests to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and finally- dismissing the case. This fact is apparent and resonates with inherent bias when Judge Alexander tells District Attorney Vangeria Harvey “It seems like what got us (the State) into this problem is: The wrong person got the money in the first place, at some point in time”.

Corruption and Collusion
These activities were done in concert with Oakland City Attorneys John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former employee Pat Smith; Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski; Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening; William Jemmott now of the law firm Wilson Elser; Todd Jones and the law firm Archer Norris; Daniel Crowley of the law firm Daniel Crowley & Assoc.; Fletcher Alford, Joel K. Liberson and the law firm Gordon & Rees; Sean Robert O'Halloran now of the law firm Crone Rozynko; Anne Brooks Harrigan now of the law firm Grancell, Lebovitz, Stander, Barnes & Reubens; Yolanda Marnell Jackson now of the law firm Jackson Alternative Dispute Resolution; the law firm of Caven, Cleaveland, Murray; the former law firm of Jackson Harrigan; John Ratto and Dean K. Beyer, of ASU Group (formerly DL Glaze); defendants Rescue Rooter and Bay Area Carpet Cleaning; and retired Judges David Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge. Retired Judges Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge, though they live in three different counties, all coincidentally hired the same Oakland defense firm run by former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams whom was responsible for providing the files to the defendants initially that was then given to her client Judge Lee for trial. There has been judiciary litigation support given by now Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham and Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch whom had disqualifications or complaints filed against them with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, Victoria Henley of The California Judicial Council, Ronald G. Overholt of The California Judges Association, The Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Alameda County Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez that portrays corruption.

This onerous, odious taint and obvious complicity in quilt of these crimes makes it legally impossible for Brown to unbiasedly and practically investigate and prosecute the wrong doing of ALL the parties known to have committed these heinous, over 13 years of crimes against al-Hakim, his family, business, clients, community, and humanity as he himself defended the criminals and covered up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!

Investigation Must Go Forward
Theses are some of the myriad of reasons this matter is being referred back to Congressman John Conyers and the Judiciary Committee and to you, the United States Attorney General and the Department of Justice for complete investigation into the actions of the various Judges, court administration, State Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, various attorneys, defendants and their employees, agents, contractors, experts, and witnesses and the prosecution of the crimes against al-Hakim.

This ultimate form of persecution through punishment by corruption is unacceptable in a civilized society and undermines human dignity. (UN General Assembly, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty, Resolution 62/149, Dec. 18, 2007; reaffirmed, Resolution 63/168, Dec. 18, 2008.) The interests of justice would best be served by the granting of a new trial to Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and his family. The trial should fully comply with international standards of justice and should not allow for the reimposition of judicial, governmental and attorney corruption, fruad, misconduct, Islamophobia and Xenophobia.

It is noted with great interest that you both have stood for Government Transparency, Accountability, Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government, maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards, “Whistleblower's” Program, Legal Services aimed at improving conditions for the poor, initiated law suits against individuals and corporations allegedly causing harm to the public and environment, elder abuse, homeowner and tenant rights, the foreclosure and banking crisis, and violent crime as has Attorney General and candidate for Governor Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley.

It is noted with great interest the actions you have taken with regard to Senator Ted Stevens' conviction to assure that he not be denied his constitutional rights. You were specifically outraged by the fact that the prosecution withheld information critical to the defense's argument for acquittal, a violation clearly committed by the courts and defense in al-Hakim's case. Though not a US senator of great wealth and power, al-Hakim is a Black man revered around the world for his intelligence, courage, clarity, and commitment and deserves no less than Senator Stevens.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence while he was at a previously approved court noticed leave for a funeral for the second death of an over 40 year friend that occurred during this trial amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is known for, among other things, having said that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" . Ignoring any instance of racism inside the courtroom leads to injustice that threatens us all.

There is no statute of limitations on the US Constitution and I therefore request that you do all within your power to review the totality of the circumstances as they are now known in 2010 in both cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and ensure that his Constitutional rights (in the form of racially-tinged and religiously motivated corruption, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct) were and are not abridged. The imperative for a civil rights investigation is clear and I specifically request that of your office.

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim is prepared to meet with you or anyone you designate for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue on this matter and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Please accept this request within all applicable rules and regulations.

As the undersigned, I state for myself that I have willingly endorsed this petition with my signature that will be appended here based on the contact information I entered into this online form.

Cordially,

(Your signature will be appended here based on the contact information you enter in the online form and once you click on 'Sign Petition' it goes through immediately)