Petition To The Honorable President Barack Hussein Obama II
Sign this petition NOW to stand against Corruption; Governmental, Legal and Police Misconduct; White Collar Crime; Unfair Employment and Business Practices; Consumer Fraud; and show YOUR SUPPORT for Government Transparency; Accountability; Civic Reform; Enforcing Ethical Standards; Civil Rights and Religious Freedom!
Petition To The Honorables President Barack Hussein Obama II and United States Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Who Would You Like to Send Your Petition To? Please select one. Copy and paste your information along with the Petition in the comments section below and send it to us for delivery. Thanks in advance!
By typing YOUR information herein you are affixing YOUR Signature to this Petition (Required):
From: Your Name (required)
City You Live In (required)
State You Live In (required)
Your Zip Code (required)
Your Email (required)
Todays Date (required)
I Want to Submit This Petition.
Error: Contact form not found.
To: The Honorable President Barack Hussein Obama II
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500
The Honorable Mr. Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
United States Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20500
cc: U.N. Secy Gen Ban Ki-Moon, High Commissioner for Human Rights Ms. Navanethem Pillay, President of the United Nations Human Rights Council Mr. Martin Ihoeghian Uhomoibhi, The United States Senate and House Judiciary Committees, and The Congressional Black Caucus
The Honorables President Barack Hussein Obama II and Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.:
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, Pursuant to the spirit of the United States Constitution and free democracy, as registered and qualified citizens and electors of the United States of America, am writing you with a sense of grave concern and outrage to petition you and request your personal and immediate intervention to put an end to an egregious injustice in the cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. CSAA, Alameda County Case No. 811337-3 and Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. RESCUE INDUSTRIES, INC.,Case No. 821885-2.
Anyone whom has heard about this case, read the case files, news reports, viewed videos or information contained and filed in the cases including briefs and opinions of the Courts, knows that both of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim’s trials were tried and adjudicated amid corruption, sensationalism and hysteria that, at its core, constituted a racial frenzy and religious persecution. Indicting words from the Judges while on the bench in both cases, themselves, point to racism, bias and prejudice even inside the Courtroom.
I call on you for remedy of this 13 year history of gross violations of United States constitutional law and international standards of justice as documented by many legal groups around the world and for the Justice Department to immediately commence a civil rights investigation to examine the many examples of egregious and racist judicial, prosecutorial, attorney, and corporate misconduct dating back to the original Rescue Industries trial in 2003 and continuing through the CSAA trial ending in 2008 to the current inaction of the State of California Appeals and Supreme Courts. The statute of limitations should not be a factor in this case as there is very strong evidence of an ongoing conspiracy to deny Abdul-Jalil his constitutional rights.
The al-Hakim v. CSAA, and Rescue Industries cases, are both over $20 million, 13 year; contentious legal actions; that has the largest case file in the history of Alameda County Superior Court, with over 70 file boxes of pleadings; over 120 motions and responses; al-Hakim had over 300 trail exhibits; over 5,000 pages of exhibits; 3,000 pages of documents for trial rebuttal argument; 20 expert witnesses; 77 other witnesses; over 100 pages of jury instructions; with Disqualification’s filed against EVERY Judge for numerous charges from judicial misconduct to corruption, where EVERY judge in this case has admitted error, committed perjury, recused themselves, or all three!
Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, a very well known, successful business manager, producer, and Muslim of native African-American descent from Oakland, California, filed a Federal Complaint with the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, of a hate crime of Islamophobia and Xenophobia committed against him by Judge David C. Lee during the Rescue Industries trial in Superior Court of Alameda County, California.
This effort is to continue moving this investigation forward with charges of criminal extrinsic fraud upon the court of the State of California, spoliation of evidence, and the doctrine “unclean hands” against defendants/hostile intervener AAA Insurance; Ron Cook and the law firm of WILLOUGHBY, STUART & BENING; defense counsel Steve Barber and the law firm of Ropers Majeski; and Oakland City Attorney John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former Oakland City employee Pat Smith provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file, willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence.
The Federal Complaint, drafted and filed by Abdul-Jalil in pro per, has broad based support from Democrats and Republicans, was submitted by Congresswoman Barbara Lee with the offices of Congressmen John Conyers, and Charles Rangel, has been review by several legal experts, with advocacy by former Republican Senator J. C. Watts, a client of al-Hakim’s.
The Federal Complaint addressed the concern that a Superior Court Judges’ conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the bench upon which the judge rules is “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone’s civil rights is a federal crime. “Muslims, just as any other group, can not be afraid to speak up when their rights have been abridged. If one does not speak up, then the transgressions goes unreported and the perpetrator goes on to harm again unchecked, it does not matter whom the transgressor is” said al-Hakim.
The complaint, perhaps even more importantly, not only requested Merrily Friedlander, Chief of the Civil Rights Division, to make an investigation of a judicial hate crime, but also the many other civil rights and due process violations of judicial and prosecutorial misconduct, and attorney extrinsic fraud upon the court and law that are themselves directly the matters complained. J. C. Watts in asking “What does a supposed terrorist act in Russia have to do with the negligent contamination of a home in America?” posed the argument that there must be consideration of and a response to the many issues in the complaint.
After review in the U. S. A. G. Office, the case was thought of as being so egregious that even the infamous Bradley Schlozman , whom is now fired and facing Federal indictment with resigned Attorneys General Alberto Gonzalez for removing Democratic attorneys from the U. S. Attorneys Generals offices nationwide, sent al-Hakim a letter referring the matter (because of jurisdictional limitations) to the California State Attorney General, California State Bar Association, the California State Judicial Council, and California State Insurance Commissioner for investigation and prosecution. And these were Republican Judges and attorney’s being complained of!
But that could not happen. California Attorney General and candidate for Governor, Jerry Brown, responsible for carrying out the investigation of Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, current District Attorney Nancy E. O’Malley, Alameda County Superior Court, the State Appeals and Supreme Court judges, and various corporate defendants in this case is himself defending some of the criminals and covering up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!
California Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O’Malley, all claim to be proponents of Government Transparency, Accountability and Civic Reform and tout their campaign promises and accomplishments on TV and radio shows, in videos, on their websites, in numerous press releases and in the resultant news articles. To affect these lofty campaign promises, they all have paraded Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government, maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards, “Whistleblower’s” Program, Legal Services aimed at improving conditions for the poor, initiated law suits against individuals and corporations allegedly causing harm to the public and environment, elder abuse, homeowner and tenant rights, the foreclosure and banking crisis, and violent crime.
They fashion themselves as independent watchdogs and gatekeepers for the people, fighting governmental and police misconduct and corruption, crime, nepotism, unfair employment practices, violent gangs, consumer fraud, unfair business practices, California’s dysfunctional Health Care System, campaign disclosure and lobbyist activities.
According to Russo’s Web site, Real Oakland Administrative Reform (ROAR) is designed to “make city government more accountable, more transparent and more effective.”
However, a closer inspection reveals that these are no more than hollow words to veil their Failed Campaign Promises; Brokers For White Collar Crime; Advocates of Racism, Bigotry, Selective Prosecution and White Class Priviledge!
Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O’Malley’s corporate lawsuits themselves amounts to little more than the same “shakedown”they oppose when they are sued.When they settle these pretentious suits they let the corporate offender off the hook for truly untold millions of dollars in fees, fines, penalties, restitution, sanctions, costs, actual and punitive damages and the proceeds NEVER go to the victim of these corporate crooks, The PUBLIC! Further, these corporate crooks are NEVER sent to jail for their White Collar crimes, yet most minority, immigrant, or religious minority violators are sent to prison with maximum sentences for alleged minor violations. Where is the equal enforcement, justice and even handed prosecution of alleged crimes? Why do Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff, and O’Malley foster the apparent selective prosecution and litigation divide by race, money, class, sex, country of origin, religion? The public is being raped by these sleight-of-hand criminal litigation tactics of the corporate crooks, Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff, and O’Malley while being mislead into believing that they are the “Protectors of The Public Trust!” as Russo states “that it is the government’s job to conduct the peoples business on behalf of the people, accountable to the people, and in full view of the people.”
Oakland City Attorney John Russo and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams fabricated evidence and planted that evidence favorable to the defendants in the case files.
al-Hakim has also recently produced clear, irrefutable, established “smoking gun” evidence of the continued blatant illegal activities of Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former Oakland City employee Pat Smith, defense counsel Stephan Barber and defendant Ron Cook in the CSAA and the underlying Rescue Rooter case that Oakland City Attorney John Russo and the City Attorney’ Office has committed EXTRINSIC FRAUD, FRAUD UPON THE STATE, SUBORNATION AND SOLICITATION OF PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, PROVIDING LITIGATION CASE FILES AND EVIDENCE TO DEFENDANTS, SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE, FABRICATING EVIDENCE AND PLANTING FABRICATED EVIDENCE IN LITIGATION CASE FILES , ATTEMPTING TO DECEIVE THE PUBLIC IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS LITIGATION THEORY, CALUMNY DECEIT by giving the case files to defendant Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, and Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening for nearly a year; then clearly constructed fraudulent fabricated evidence in 1999 and planted that evidence favorable to the defendants in the files SIX years AFTER the case was closed; engaged in spoliation of remaining evidence in the court files from 1991; and fostered witness testimony based on this planted evidence in the al-Hakim v CSAA and the underlying Rescue Rooter case that was created thru EXTRINSIC FRAUD with accompanying testimony procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious acts by John Russo and others, they engaged in actions to destroy the litigation of al-Hakim’s legal case; they engaged in actions to coverup their unlawful acts; they committed, aided and abetted this criminal activity with this unpardonable breach in the chain of custody of the court files to accommodate the defendants litigation strategy in both the CSAA and the underlying Rescue Rooter case.
John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former Oakland City employee Pat Smith, defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook have all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpoena for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpoena for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1 million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 13 years thru the City Attorneys’ violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and the Oakland City Attorney office staffs’ criminal violations of the Civil Code, Business and Professions Code, the Rules of Professional Conduct, and the California Cannons strikes at the heart of al-Hakim’s fundamental civil and human rights, and the right to due process under the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution Amendments and the California Constitution. These actions qualify as a Hate Crime under the Unruh Rights Act, the Ralph Civil Rights Act and the Bane Act, while they are clear crimes of religious bigotry and intolerance, as such, this conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the City Attorney’s Office operates “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone’s civil rights is a federal crime. This deprivation of al-Hakim’s civil, human and due process rights by the law enforcement body of the City Attorneys’ office of Oakland rise to the level of criminal activity and “misconduct by local and federal law enforcement officials. These criminal actions by Russo and his staff demand they be issued court ordered subpoena to testify.
Action against former Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff, current District Attorney Nancy E. O’Malley, and the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS)
al-Hakim had to file an action against former District Attorney Tom Orloff and the Alameda County District Attorney’s (DA) and the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) because for over 15 years they repeatedly failed and refused to enforce the courts own orders for the fair and proper application and accounting of payments al-Hakim made in trust to the DA in their fiduciary capacity for the minor al-Hakim child depriving al-Hakim and the minor child of over $2,000 of monies paid. In doing so, the DA creating a “mythical” arrearage and open account in al-Hakim’s name and on his behalf owed to the minor child, and when al-Hakim refused to pay their fraud as he does to this day, then illegally charged al-Hakim with the crime of violating the child support statute for nonpayment, reporting the alleged violation to the State of California for Collection and the State Department of Motor Vehicles for suspension of his driving privilege for nonpayment and illegally tossing al-Hakim into “debtors prison”, suspending his drivers license, revoking his passport, and ruining his multi-million credit. ACDCSS actions and claimed “right” to perform in this manner are not contained in any State or Federal statute, regulation, or other legislative act and therefore, do not have the force of law and renders it constitutionally infirm and no court officer can merely “grant” a ruling in their favor to cover getting caught having done so.
State of California Attorney General Jerry Brown and Candidate for Governor Substitutes In
On January 22, 2008 California Attorney General Jerry Brown and the Office of The Attorney General of The State of California substituted in as attorney of record in this case for the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services allegedly “In The Interest of Justice”. What justice is there when he then defended, concealed and thereby further complicitly committed the admitted willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the State, al-Hakim and his family, and the court; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; and intimidation committed by former District Attorney Tom Orloff, current DA’s Nancy E. O’Malley, Maureen Lenahan, Valgeria Harvey, counselors L. Lavagetto, Ms. K. Pendergrass, Ms. Adler, Kris Ferre, and accountant Mr. Lovelady and others unnamed in the DA’s office; as well as Commissioner Glenn Oleon’s abuse of discretion, willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias that resulted in error.
During the appeal al-Hakim was forced to file a motion against Jerry Brown to augment the court record to include important transcripts of hearings that the DA admitted they had cheated the al-Hakim family. Despite the fact that al-Hakim had paid for the transcripts in advance, as with the motions that were “denied” because the appeals court did not rule on them in a timely manner, it also refused to augment the record on appeal when it was clear that the evidence would be harmful to the State and defendants Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) and the Alameda County District Attorney(DA). The Appeals Court had discretion to take additional evidence on appeal (Code Civ. Proc., § 909.) where the proffered evidence demonstrates that the matter turns on the evidence tendered.
Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar
Alameda County Judge Jon Tigar, visibly shaking and muttering, suffered a mental meltdown on the bench as he admitted in open court striking the Seventh Challenge For Cause, a scathing over 750 page indictment, without reading it moments after it was filed and served on him by al-Hakim in the court room on November 20, 2008!!!
After about 5 minutes of being unable to come up with anything, Tigar starts to meltdown babbling and muttering that “al-Hakim said that all the allegations in this challenge are the same as the previous ones, that he doesn’t want to go through another challenge, he wants to make the ruling on the motions, and “although the appeals court may not agree, that he was striking the challenge without reading it”, al-Hakim can file a writ if he wants and if the appeals court agrees, then al-Hakim will get another hearing”. He then states that the order will be available after the hearing.
He then avoided, failed and refused to timely file and serve a written answer to the Challenge For Cause and proceeded to rule on the matters heard that moment and denied both al-Hakim’s Motions to Vacate the Bereavement Order of April 7, 2008 and Trial Ending Minute Order of April 9, 2008 of unscrupulous Judge Tigar.
Judge Jon Tigar aborted critical witness testimony of The Honorable Judge Leo Dorado because he and Defense Counsel/ Defendants Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, as well as Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening, feared al-Hakim would explore corruption, collusion, and misconduct of the Judges and lawyers reported to U. S. Attorney General in the al-Hakim Cases!
Further, Tigar aborted the testimony of Co-Defense Counsel/Defendant Ron Cook yet al-Hakim still manage to get over 20 critical admissions of undeniable guilt of Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, and Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening. Tigar also libeled testimony and authored perjurious, deceptive, and fraudulent bereavement and trial ending orders to destroy the litigation of al-Hakim’s legal case!
Judge Tigar’s actions of “deliberate judicial dishonesty” are not only willfully and intentionally illegal, harmful, dangerous, libelous, perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent in violation of al-Hakim’s civil and human rights and right to due process: they are insolent, offensive, insulting, and impugn the integrity of the court and he did this IN SUPPORT of the DEFENDANTS LITIGATION THEORY whom served as his own legal counsel in this very same case!
There is an infinite amount of evidence herein to attest to Tigar’s lying under oath and perjury, misrepresentations, deceit, dishonesty, willful and prejudicial misconduct, bad faith, incompetence, conflicts of interest, bias, calling al-Hakim a liar without any substantiation or justification; instructing al-Hakim not to mention Tigar’s perjury or to speak his own truth; threatened retaliation to charge him with contempt when al-Hakim refused to back off his charges of the judges perjury, deceit; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and avoid appellate review; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and issues sanctions; willfully and intentionally withholding filing and serving orders (possibly backdating orders) then acted on the orders after the applicable deadlines for al-Hakim to legally and properly respond, thus forcing al-Hakim to forfeit his civil rights and right to due process; irresponsible failure as a judge to read, interpret, and apply the applicable laws, accusing al-Hakim of attacking judges in open court, has attacked other parties in open court while dressed in civilian clothes yet performing his duties as a judge and his honest refusal to recuse “goes beyond mere negligence”; this conduct falls into the category of willful misconduct by a judge as arising out of conduct which is done in bad faith and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute. The deception practiced by Judge Tigar during these events, as well as his specious actions before al-Hakim on every occasion, are equally antithetical to, and inherently incompatible with, his duties to uphold the law and the search for truth, reflects a gross lack of judicial temperament and a purpose other than the faithful discharge of judicial duty, and is at minimum improper action.
al-Hakim presents clear, uncontroverted, unopposed, uncontested, corroborated proof Tigar has written, signed and submitted willfully perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent orders in attempting to deceive the public in support of his rulings; threatened, and belittled al-Hakim; made improper references of al-Hakim’s character and as being untruthful; coupled with his perjury regarding the discovery matters and categorical denial of every discovery issue raised before him by al-Hakim reflected a prejudgment of al-Hakim’s discovery claims, his case and a lack of impartiality; responded to his disqualification by his failure and refusal to timely filing an answer; doing so 8 days later only after al-Hakim had requested the written answer at least six times; filing an answer 8 days later only after al-Hakim contested his continued sitting in the case and indicated his intent to file an appeal for same; stating al-Hakim “attacks judges” in his answer without any explanation; calling al-Hakim a liar in his answer without any substance; publicly criticizing al-Hakim in court on the record; repeatedly lied under oath; made knowingly false statements in an effort to demean, humiliate and provoke plaintiff while lying under oath and perjury; dishonesty; fraudulent deception; calumny deceit; willful and prejudicial misconduct; abuse of discretion; negligence; bias; prejudice; misrepresentation; incompetence; conflict of interest; bad faith; collusion; denial of due process; obstruction of justice; racism; bigotry; has exhibited, expressed and shown a fixed opinion of al-Hakim; displayed favoritism towards the defendants; made false accusations; harassed al-Hakim; has willfully, deceitfully and recklessly indulged in a series of offensive acts and statements against plaintiff and has displayed disdain, malice, and a mental attitude or disposition toward al-Hakim that prohibits the right to a fair hearing or trial; failed and refused to respond to the allegations contained in the challenges for cause; conduct prejudicial; and advocated a judicial imprimatur of the defense’s position were grounds for disqualification under Code Civ. Proc. on the ground of misconduct, prejudicial misconduct, bias, and prejudice in violations of Code Civ. Proc., Business and Professions Codes, the Rules of Professional Conduct, the California Const., the California Code of Judicial Ethics Canons that violates al-Hakim’s fundamental civil rights and due process under the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution and as applicable to the State of California Constitution as a “miscarriage of justice.” Judge Tigar’s persistent willful misconduct, bad faith, mistreatment, promised retaliation and “atmosphere of unfairness” determines that there is a high probability he will continue his unethical behavior if he were to continue in a judicial capacity in the future.
California Appeals Court
al-Hakim has feared, and quite correctly so, that as in the past, this California Appeals Court Division lead by Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, and court administrators Mary Quilez and Clerk Diana Herbert had engaged in and were directly responsible for the denials and resulting dismissals of his appeals actions as they would not act on his motions and merely deny them outright or by not making a ruling until it’s jurisdiction has run and any order is “timed out”. He has had this Appeals court do this twice when it was known to the court the information sought to be found or augmented to the record was fatal to the opposition, they denied them outright or by not making a ruling until it’s jurisdiction has run.
al-Hakim had requested the Appeals Court grant his request to supplement the record on Appeal and present evidence imperative to the establishment of Ron Cook, the law firm of Willoughby Stuart and Bening, CSAA and it’s defense counsels Sean O’Halloran, Stephan Barber and the firm of Ropers Majeski as the hostile intervener in his underlying case against Rescue Industries and Bay Area Carpets, provided evidence that was procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious testimony by them and the underlying defendants, their counsels and experts; engaged in actions to interfere with his legal case; engaged in actions to coverup the unlawful act of suborn and solicited perjurious testimony; committed fraud upon the court of the State of California; committed willful, criminal and corrupt perjury, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud; fraudulent concealment by willfully and intentionally withholding their knowledge and insight of the intervention hearing and the transcript of said hearing; and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their responsibility and the legal impact; extrinsic fraud; spoliation of evidence; and qualify for the doctrine of unclean hands with the appropriate consequent sanctions and punishment upon them was denied with no explanation.
As these actions were taken against the State, the State has a vested interested in this matter not going forward in a fair and just manner, and is the basis for not providing al-Hakim with the clerks transcripts that were ordered and paid for; the ordered and paid for transcripts of the hearings to complete the record on appeal; denying the motions to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and not ruling on the July 31, 2008 Motion for Reconsideration of the courts July 19, 2008 order denying al-Hakim requests to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and finally- dismissing the case. This fact is apparent and resonates with inherent bias when Judge Alexander tells District Attorney Vangeria Harvey “It seems like what got us (the State) into this problem is: The wrong person got the money in the first place, at some point in time”.
Corruption and Collusion
These activities were done in concert with Oakland City Attorneys John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former employee Pat Smith; Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski; Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening; William Jemmott now of the law firm Wilson Elser; Todd Jones and the law firm Archer Norris; Daniel Crowley of the law firm Daniel Crowley & Assoc.; Fletcher Alford, Joel K. Liberson and the law firm Gordon & Rees; Sean Robert O’Halloran now of the law firm Crone Rozynko; Anne Brooks Harrigan now of the law firm Grancell, Lebovitz, Stander, Barnes & Reubens; Yolanda Marnell Jackson now of the law firm Jackson Alternative Dispute Resolution; the law firm of Caven, Cleaveland, Murray; the former law firm of Jackson Harrigan; John Ratto and Dean K. Beyer, of ASU Group (formerly D. L. Glaze); defendants Rescue Rooter and Bay Area Carpet Cleaning; and retired Judges David Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge. Retired Judges Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge, though they live in three different counties, all coincidentally hired the same Oakland defense firm run by former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams whom was responsible for providing the files to the defendants initially that was then given to her client Judge Lee for trial. There has been judiciary litigation support given by now Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham and Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch whom had disqualifications or complaints filed against them with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, Victoria Henley of The California Judicial Council, Ronald G. Overholt of The California Judges Association, The Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Alameda County Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez that portrays corruption.
This onerous, odious taint and obvious complicity in quilt of these crimes makes it legally impossible for Brown to unbiasedly and practically investigate and prosecute the wrong doing of ALL the parties known to have committed these heinous, over 13 years of crimes against al-Hakim, his family, business, clients, community, and humanity as he himself defended the criminals and covered up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!
Investigation Must Go Forward
Theses are some of the myriad of reasons this matter is being referred back to Congressman John Conyers and the Judiciary Committee and to you, the United States Attorney General and the Department of Justice for complete investigation into the actions of the various Judges, court administration, State Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, various attorneys, defendants and their employees, agents, contractors, experts, and witnesses and the prosecution of the crimes against al-Hakim.
This ultimate form of persecution through punishment by corruption is unacceptable in a civilized society and undermines human dignity. (U.N. General Assembly, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty, Resolution 62/149, Dec. 18, 2007; reaffirmed, Resolution 63/168, Dec. 18, 2008.) The interests of justice would best be served by the granting of a new trial to Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and his family. The trial should fully comply with international standards of justice and should not allow for the reimposition of judicial, governmental and attorney corruption, fruad, misconduct, Islamophobia and Xenophobia.
It is noted with great interest that you both have stood for Government Transparency, Accountability, Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government, maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards, “Whistleblower’s” Program, Legal Services aimed at improving conditions for the poor, initiated law suits against individuals and corporations allegedly causing harm to the public and environment, elder abuse, homeowner and tenant rights, the foreclosure and banking crisis, and violent crime as has Attorney General and candidate for Governor Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O’Malley.
It is noted with great interest the actions you have taken with regard to Senator Ted Stevens’ conviction to assure that he not be denied his constitutional rights. You were specifically outraged by the fact that the prosecution withheld information critical to the defense’s argument for acquittal, a violation clearly committed by the courts and defense in al-Hakim’s case. Though not a US senator of great wealth and power, al-Hakim is a Black man revered around the world for his intelligence, courage, clarity, and commitment and deserves no less than Senator Stevens.
This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim’s case was concluded in his absence amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.
This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim’s case was concluded in his absence while he was at a previously approved court noticed leave for a funeral for the second death of an over 40 year friend that occurred during this trial amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is known for, among other things, having said that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”. Ignoring any instance of racism inside the courtroom leads to injustice that threatens us all.
There is no statute of limitations on the U.S. Constitution and I therefore request that you do all within your power to review the totality of the circumstances as they are now known in 2010 in both cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and ensure that his Constitutional rights (in the form of racially-tinged and religiously motivated corruption, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct) were and are not abridged. The imperative for a civil rights investigation is clear and I specifically request that of your office.
Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim is prepared to meet with you or anyone you designate for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue on this matter and look forward to hearing from you soon.
Please accept this request within all applicable rules and regulations.
As the undersigned, I state for myself that I have willingly endorsed this petition with my signature that will be appended here based on the contact information I entered into this online form.
Cordially,
(Your signature will be appended here based on the contact information you enter in the online form and once you click on ‘Sign Petition’ it goes through immediately)
Comments